When taking the DTFT of a discrete-time signal $x[n]=a \times u[n]$, the book "Signals and Systems" by Chi-Tsong Chen claims that the result is $\frac 1 {1-a \cdot e^{-j \cdot \omega \cdot T}}$; however, many other sources claim the DTFT is $\frac 1 {1-a \cdot e^{-j \cdot \omega}}$ without the T term.

The book I have states that $x[n]=x(nT)$ by definition and the DTFT by definition is

$$X(\omega)= \sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty}x(nT)e^{-j \omega n T}$$.

Can someone explain the reason for the differences?

Thank you for your time.


This is just normalized frequency versus un-normalized frequency.

Check the capitalization of omega. The capital omega $\Omega$, usually refers to the normalized frequency (with $-\pi$ and $\pi$ corresponding to $-f_s/2$ and $f_s/2$) and the normal omega $\omega$, to the regular angular frequency.

Your two sources just use different convention. There is no contradiction.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.