What assumptions should be used to invert spectrum into time domain data?

This question comes from a realistic problem that how to obtain a time domain wind pressure from known wind spectrum. Or similarly, gets rail surface curve from spatial rail spectrum.

Obviously, this question does not have unique solution, since phase information is not given. Usually we assume that phase of the time/spatial domain data in uniformly distributed in ($-\pi$, $\pi$], and using a random distributed phase to do inverse Fourier transform to obtain the time/spatial domain data. However, I feel not so comfortable to assign such rapid changing phase to the spectrum. I wonder whether there are some more reasonable assumptions to get these jobs done?

BTW, question ifft of signal without phase information discussed some strategies on how to do this job. @LutzL suggested Human perception can be used to help determine the phase information. But I cannot understand how Human perception is working. @Hilmar said minimum phase may be a choice, but I do not know whether there is a physical meaning of minimum phase. Is there any discussion to show minimum phase is a good choice for physical phenomena, like wind.

• What information are you hoping to extract from the time domain data? As you point out, there is no unique solution, So the best you can do is produce a time series that gives rise to the same spectrum. But it won't tell you with any degree of certainty whether the wind speed was 30 km/h at time t or 0 km/h at time t – nispio Jan 22 '14 at 23:18
• We want to use the time domain data as an input to other program. Because wind is flow of air, I think there are solutions which are more natural than other ones. Is there any method that can take theories like fluid mechanics to determine what properties the phase of the wind should have? – Kattern Jan 23 '14 at 1:42
• The more information you have about the system, the more you can start to restrict your solution space. For example, if you know that wind pressure is always non-negative, that could significantly reduce the number of plausible solutions. Depending on the form that these restrictions take, you might be able to use Monte-Carlo methods to converge to more likely solutions. However, unless the restrictions necessitate a unique solution you cannot say with any certainty that the wind pressure at time t was q. – nispio Jan 23 '14 at 18:51
• Yes, I agree 'The more information you have about the system, the more you can start to restrict your solution space', but I do not know how to restrict the solution space in action. We can assume wind is caused by difference of pressure, and friction along the path, vortex from obstacle introduce turbulence in the air flow. The wind is governed by air dynamic equation. Then how to use these information restrict the solution space, they seems not related to the phase of pressure. – Kattern Jan 24 '14 at 9:27
• I don't know if this is relevant but there is a FIR filter design program called METEOR. It uses linear programming to find coefficients for a linear phase FIR given spectrum data. You can find more info here: cs.princeton.edu/~ken/meteor.html – Emanuel Landeholm Feb 23 '15 at 11:22