3
$\begingroup$

The Auto-Correlation function of Walsh-Hadamard codewords does not have a good characteristics.

It can have more than one peak and thus, the Walsh-Hadamard codes do not have the best spreading behavior or correlation property.

The cross-correlation function of the Walsh-Hadamard codewords can also be non-zero for a number of time shifts and unsynchronized users can interfere with each other.

My Questions:

Which other codes or sequences show :

A good auto-correlation attribute?
Good Cross-correlation Property ?
$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

There is a vast literature on this subject. In particular, deleting one bit (the leading bit in one specific implementation) from each of the Walsh-Hadamard sequences and applying a permutation to the remaining $2^n-1$ bits will result in $2^n$ sequences of length $2^n-1$ that consist of

(i) the all-zeroes sequence

(ii) the $2^n-1$ cyclic shifts of a pseudonoise (PN), or maximal-length linear feedback shift register (LFSR), sequence

A PN sequence has ideal autocorrelation properties, but the cross-correlation between a sequence and its cyclic shift has a peak value that is the same as the autocorrelation peak.

For more than you probably want to know, I refer you to the paper D.V. Sarwate and M.B. Pursley, "Cross-correlation properties of pseudorandom and related sequences," Proc. IEEE, vol.68, pp.593-619, May 1980. It includes a detailed discussion of the Gold sequences mentioned by JasonR as well as the small sets and large sets of Kasami sequences that you will encounter in some applications.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Sir I got the paper.Please do not mind me asking that are you the same Dilip Sarwate? $\endgroup$ – user2888999 Dec 12 '13 at 15:09
1
$\begingroup$

Barker codes are typically used in RADAR applications since they have a high correlation peak and low (sometimes constant) secondary lobes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barker_code

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ And what if we need a binary Barker code of length more than 13? By the way, Barker codes do not have constant secondary lobes except at length 4 when the sidelobes are identically 0 and we have what is sometimes called a perfect sequence. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Dec 11 '13 at 21:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.