Timeline for Digital Image Processing Framework
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jul 6, 2018 at 22:27 | history | suggested | tobassist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix typo in title
|
| Jul 6, 2018 at 17:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 6, 2018 at 22:27 | |||||
| Jul 6, 2018 at 15:52 | history | edited | Royi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02 | comment | added | mchlfchr | I made the experience that octave and image processing doesn't work well enough to be in competition with proprietary software and/or OpenCV. Give python and openCV a try. | |
| Aug 22, 2013 at 20:48 | answer | added | DarenW | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 10, 2013 at 1:57 | comment | added | endolith | "However octave is too slow when running nested loops" That's because it's exactly what you're not supposed to do. | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 15:30 | comment | added | Jason R | Also, Octave (which is similar to MATLAB) can perform better if you structure your code differently. Instead of using loops, which are interpreted and slow, if you can express your algorithm using vector or matrix operations, you can obtain much better performance. | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 22:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSignals/status/343502151072493568 | ||
| Jun 8, 2013 at 17:28 | comment | added | Wandering Logic | OpenCV from python: opencv.willowgarage.com/documentation/python. See also wiki.python.org/moin/NumericAndScientific/Plotting | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 16:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 9, 2013 at 20:13 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2013 at 16:18 | history | asked | Alfatau | CC BY-SA 3.0 |