Timeline for What is the uHz-rotator algorithm?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2013 at 13:30 | comment | added | Peter K.♦ | @Davorin: No, nothing. Let me try another email address. | |
| May 11, 2013 at 13:02 | comment | added | Davorin | @PK please post if there's any response from the author. | |
| May 8, 2013 at 16:29 | vote | accept | Davorin | ||
| May 6, 2013 at 13:36 | comment | added | Peter K.♦ | @JasonR: Understood. I've updated the answer with a table. I still think the numbers quoted by the website are a little squirrely. | |
| May 6, 2013 at 13:36 | history | edited | Peter K.♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated with table for different values.
|
| May 6, 2013 at 12:45 | comment | added | Jason R | @PeterK: I think that the author is assuming a much higher signal-to-noise ratio than the 10 dB that you used above. If you increase the SNR to something like 30 dB, then the number of required samples is much more modest. | |
| May 6, 2013 at 12:21 | comment | added | Peter K.♦ | @JimClay: Understood. Depending on your application, one person's "low noise" is another's "high noise". My frame of reference is SONAR, where a good signal-to-noise ratio is anything above -10dB. For me, $\sigma^2 = 0.1$ is low noise. | |
| May 6, 2013 at 1:21 | comment | added | Jim Clay | But the claim is that it can be done "[u]nder good conditions (strong signal and low noise)", which means that the variance will be very low compared to $A$. | |
| May 6, 2013 at 0:22 | history | edited | Peter K.♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added PS
|
| May 6, 2013 at 0:08 | history | answered | Peter K.♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |