Timeline for Inverse DFT on the first half time domain ("DFT unpad property"?)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2023 at 9:52 | history | edited | OverLordGoldDragon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improve searchability, somewhat clickbaity
|
| Mar 17, 2022 at 19:12 | vote | accept | diegor | ||
| Mar 17, 2022 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSignals/status/1504382060819013636 | ||
| Mar 17, 2022 at 0:15 | answer | added | Fat32 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 16, 2022 at 22:02 | answer | added | OverLordGoldDragon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 16, 2022 at 20:38 | vote | accept | diegor | ||
| Mar 17, 2022 at 19:12 | |||||
| Mar 16, 2022 at 20:38 | answer | added | diegor | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 14, 2022 at 21:23 | comment | added | Dan Boschen | If the signal in the time domain is all real (or is all imaginary) then you can use just the N/2 coefficients as you suggest. Please clarify is that is the case. | |
| Mar 14, 2022 at 21:09 | comment | added | MBaz | The answer is No, it's not possible. However, if you explain what you're trying to do, and define "manipulate", it may be possible to provide some pointers. | |
| S Mar 14, 2022 at 20:35 | review | First questions | |||
| Mar 14, 2022 at 20:39 | |||||
| S Mar 14, 2022 at 20:35 | history | asked | diegor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |