Timeline for Doubt: Signal detection in noise Part 1
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2020 at 17:08 | history | edited | Sm1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited the question to make it align with the answer received
|
| Dec 28, 2020 at 17:06 | vote | accept | Sm1 | ||
| Dec 27, 2020 at 17:53 | history | edited | Sm1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 671 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2020 at 17:51 | comment | added | Sm1 | I have 2 issues. (a) how to estimate the signal $\hat{s}(t)$ after signal detection -- From answer & comments, it appears that matched filter is not an estimation method but a detection technique. I posted the code to verify if I have done the estimation correctly or not. Code output shows that $s(t)$ and $\hat{s}(t)$ are identical. So, it seems that the estimation was possible. (b) Another issue is why do estimation or detection in cases where the template or a copy of the signal is already present at reciever for nonblind methods such as matched filter, nonblind least mean squares etc. | |
| S Dec 27, 2020 at 16:26 | history | suggested | Engineer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
just clean up the notation
|
| Dec 27, 2020 at 13:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 27, 2020 at 16:26 | |||||
| Dec 27, 2020 at 6:17 | history | edited | Sm1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
elaborated the question for clarity
|
| Dec 27, 2020 at 5:45 | answer | added | V.V.T | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 27, 2020 at 2:04 | history | asked | Sm1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |