Timeline for WOLA vs Simple Hamming Window on signal before FFT
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2020 at 13:45 | vote | accept | Michael Rahav | ||
| May 21, 2020 at 13:44 | answer | added | dsp_user | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 21, 2020 at 10:45 | comment | added | A_A | @dsp_user Could I please ask you to turn the comment into an answer so that we close the question "gracefully"? This gives Michael Astahov the opportunity to accept / upvote it too. Otherwise, it is likely that it will be circulating the board as "unanswered" which is not what is really hapenning here. | |
| May 21, 2020 at 10:44 | history | edited | A_A | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 21, 2020 at 7:05 | comment | added | dsp_user | The purpose of WOLA (and OLA for that matter) is to resynthesize (recombine) the multiple, overlapping fft segments (chunks) in order to generate a time domain signal (waveform). It should not be used for fft analysis so it's not appropriate for your use case. As for question #3, using a Hamming window is fine. | |
| May 21, 2020 at 6:42 | review | First posts | |||
| May 21, 2020 at 11:39 | |||||
| May 21, 2020 at 6:36 | history | asked | Michael Rahav | CC BY-SA 4.0 |