Timeline for How to increase resolution of FFT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 at 5:10 | vote | accept | sarath chandran | ||
| Dec 25, 2018 at 17:31 | comment | added | Cedron Dawg | Okay. For the Macleod tweak I have only derived the formula and done some testing, not written the article yet. A link to my blog and my email address can be found in my profile. My original formula is a 3 bin pure real tone case and can be found at dsprelated.com/showarticle/773.php | |
| Dec 25, 2018 at 17:11 | comment | added | user28715 | cool, why not post a link? | |
| Dec 25, 2018 at 16:46 | comment | added | Cedron Dawg | The frequency formulas in my blog articles are much more accurate than any of those documented by Jacobsen and Kootsookos as theirs are all approximations and mine are exact solutions. Mine are also more robust in the presence of noise than any of theirs, other than Macleod's. The good news is I have been able to tweak Macleod's formula to be exact without losing its robustness (article coming soon). Macleods estimator (and my tweak of it) still requires fewer calculations than Jacobsen's estimator, despite Jacobsen's claim his is simpler. | |
| Dec 24, 2018 at 16:54 | history | edited | Peter K.♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixing spelling of Eric's family name; inlined links.
|
| Dec 24, 2018 at 16:02 | history | answered | user28715 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |