Timeline for "Complex Matched Filter"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 18:54 | comment | added | Matt L. | @HatemTawfik: Yes, a matched filter taking the channel into account is often not possible, because the channel is unknown and/or time-varying. In practice you might have an (adaptive) fractionally-spaced equalizer that also performs the function of the matched filter. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 17:58 | comment | added | Robert L. | @HatemTawfik-- perhaps ask that as a separate question, since it might be too complicated a question to do justice in a comment | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 17:04 | comment | added | Hatem Tawfik | Thank you, but then usually or perhaps generally one designs a matched filter at the receiver assuming an AWGN channel, and for channel correction one uses an equalizer after channel estimation, right? | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 16:56 | history | answered | Matt L. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |