Timeline for Why is the raised cosine pulse for digital communications so popular?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 22:21 | vote | accept | Probably | ||
| Apr 25, 2018 at 17:02 | comment | added | MBaz | That's a good point, and something that I'll change in my own graduate wireless course next year. In fact, I was inspired to research this subject by McCune's recent textbook on wireless (he's one of the co-authors of the paper I linked to). | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 15:45 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | I think the "don't have much experience with anything but RRC" definitively applies to me, too. This might actually be an important reason: noone hears about anything but RRC in their education. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 14:01 | comment | added | MBaz | @MarcusMüller I believe that other pulses are equally good or better in that regard, too. I don't have a lot of experience with them, though. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 7:44 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | well, it does still prevent ISI sufficiently well when heavily truncated; that's a pretty good property for practical implementation in digital systems. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 1:53 | history | answered | MBaz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |