Timeline for Convex Hull Area in Pixels
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 31, 2023 at 16:08 | vote | accept | penelope | ||
Jul 2, 2023 at 19:08 | comment | added | Royi | @CrisLuengo, I am happy. You add a lot of quality stuff here :-). | |
Jul 2, 2023 at 16:03 | comment | added | Cris Luengo | @Royi Done. Maybe one day I’ll convert this to a blog post with some figures and so on, it’s an interesting topic. Thanks for encouraging me to write this! — I’ve also deleted the comments I wrote here, to avoid duplicate information. | |
Jul 2, 2023 at 16:02 | answer | added | Cris Luengo | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 2, 2023 at 6:07 | comment | added | Royi |
@CrisLuengo, I am glad you saw this. Could you write a short answer? I am trying to reduce the number of unanswered questions in the image-processing tag.
|
|
Jul 1, 2023 at 17:20 | comment | added | Royi |
For those calculations I'd use DIPlib . It is written by one of the forums' members (Cris Luengo).
|
|
Jul 1, 2023 at 17:19 | history | edited | Royi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
Jul 1, 2023 at 17:18 | comment | added | Royi | You may read about this in blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2023/03/21/… and blogs.mathworks.com/steve/2011/10/04/…. | |
Jul 17, 2017 at 17:58 | comment | added | Tolga Birdal | Sure, but isn't that an edge case? Maybe you could compute and see if that bias is systematic. If so, you could offset that amount. | |
Jul 17, 2017 at 15:12 | comment | added | penelope | @TolgaBirdal If I did that (ignoring that I am trying to sum up area and length), the perimeter in the example I give of a 2x2 pixel rectangle is 4, and the convex hull area is calculated as 1; so I would get the total convex hull area as 4+1=5 (which is no more correct than 1...) | |
Jul 17, 2017 at 14:25 | comment | added | Tolga Birdal | why not add the perimeter of the convex hull on top of its area? | |
Jul 17, 2017 at 14:03 | history | asked | penelope | CC BY-SA 3.0 |