Timeline for Additive Gaussian white noise - bandwidth
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2016 at 14:41 | answer | added | Gilles | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 16, 2016 at 13:32 | history | edited | Gilles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor formatting
|
| May 16, 2016 at 13:20 | comment | added | Dilip Sarwate | Why should the power at the output be different for you who are using Hertz and your friend who is analyzing the same system but using rad/s? The answer is the same in both cases! Read my comment on Jan Kruger's answer. | |
| May 16, 2016 at 12:43 | history | edited | MBaz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add math markup
|
| May 16, 2016 at 12:09 | answer | added | Jan Krüger | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 16, 2016 at 10:04 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | Ok, you integrate from $-B$ to $B$, so your overall bandwidth for noise observation is definitely $2B$, not $B$. The formula doesn't care what units your $B$ or $N$ has. So your question doesn't mean anything. | |
| May 16, 2016 at 10:03 | history | edited | Marcus Müller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2016 at 8:18 | review | First posts | |||
| May 16, 2016 at 12:43 | |||||
| May 16, 2016 at 8:16 | history | asked | user21037 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |