Timeline for Edge detection gives pixel ids, why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://dsp.stackexchange.com/ with https://dsp.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 14, 2012 at 0:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 4, 2012 at 3:03 | |||||
| Jul 2, 2012 at 8:30 | history | edited | Naresh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 51 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2012 at 7:04 | comment | added | rwong | Are you trying to get curves or contour chain (in the form of "chain code", or linked lists of edge pixels)? If so, please edit your question. | |
| Jun 27, 2012 at 10:03 | comment | added | Naresh | I didnt know its sobel based. Still I need arcs between pixels not 'on' the pixels. I gotta way i guess. because i specifically need edges along the arcs. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 16:12 | comment | added | Niki Estner | I'm not sure I understood your question: IIRC the Canny edge detector uses a Sobel operator underneath, which is essentially a central difference - i.e. the edges are centered on pixels, not between pixels. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 14:35 | history | asked | Naresh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |