Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

Partitioning

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the optimal split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Non-uniform partitioned convolution was popularized by William G. Gardner, Efficient Convolution without Input-Output Delay, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1995 March, available online at http://www.cs.ust.hk/mjg_lib/bibs/DPSu/DPSu.Files/Ga95.PDF.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

Partitioning

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Non-uniform partitioned convolution was popularized by William G. Gardner, Efficient Convolution without Input-Output Delay, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1995 March, available online at http://www.cs.ust.hk/mjg_lib/bibs/DPSu/DPSu.Files/Ga95.PDF.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

Partitioning

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the optimal split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Non-uniform partitioned convolution was popularized by William G. Gardner, Efficient Convolution without Input-Output Delay, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1995 March, available online at http://www.cs.ust.hk/mjg_lib/bibs/DPSu/DPSu.Files/Ga95.PDF.

deleted 16 characters in body
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

enter image description herePartitioning

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Non-uniform partitioned convolution was popularized by William G. Gardner, Efficient Convolution without Input-Output Delay, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1995 March, available online at http://www.cs.ust.hk/mjg_lib/bibs/DPSu/DPSu.Files/Ga95.PDF.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

enter image description here

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

Partitioning

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Non-uniform partitioned convolution was popularized by William G. Gardner, Efficient Convolution without Input-Output Delay, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1995 March, available online at http://www.cs.ust.hk/mjg_lib/bibs/DPSu/DPSu.Files/Ga95.PDF.

added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized blockspartitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the blockpartition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

enter image description here

Each blockpartition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by fast Fourier transform (FFT)FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized blocks. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the block length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

enter image description here

Each block length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by fast Fourier transform (FFT).

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

Real-time low-latency partitioned convolution reverb with a long impulse response works by dividing the impulse response into unequally sized partitions. The shortest partitions (blocks) are at the beginning of the impulse response, and the partition length grows towards the end of the impulse response:

enter image description here

Each partition length can be processed separately, giving for each a latency that is for fast Fourier transform (FFT) -based convolution perhaps a couple of times the partition length. Convolution outputs for all partition lengths are summed forming the final composite output. When partitioning the impulse response, the partition of a particular length must not appear before the time that equals the latency of convolution of that partition length. A time-domain finite impulse response (FIR) filter can be used for the beginning of the impulse response because that may be more efficient than doing the low-length convolution by FFT.

What is the optimal partitioning for a given impulse response length and the split point between time-domain FIR and FFT convolution should be tested on the target platform. A challenging aspect of non-uniform partitioned convolution is scheduling of the work.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63
Loading
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63
Loading
Source Link
Olli Niemitalo
  • 13.7k
  • 1
  • 35
  • 63
Loading