Timeline for Will lossy compression prevent me from performing audio analysis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2015 at 13:29 | vote | accept | JFelix | ||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:01 | answer | added | Fat32 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 15:29 | comment | added | MSalters | Using a 64 bits version of Matlab may be the simpler option. | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 14:06 | vote | accept | JFelix | ||
| Jan 11, 2015 at 13:29 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 13:33 | answer | added | JRE | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 13:00 | answer | added | m fran | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 12:16 | comment | added | jojeck♦ | From my experience I can confirm that in some cases performance of the system improved when using the compressed data. Especially when data was recorded using codecs such as AAC. Nevertheless sometimes it deteriorated performance of the recognition system. I believe that is up to you to check how pre-processing affects performance of your system. No easy way to tell without knowing nature of sound, features and system itself. | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 12:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 12:00 | history | asked | JFelix | CC BY-SA 3.0 |