Timeline for Does sampling ~> Nyquist frequency capture harmonics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2016 at 17:12 | vote | accept | Charles Burns | ||
| Mar 19, 2014 at 0:12 | history | edited | hotpaw2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2014 at 0:06 | history | edited | hotpaw2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 23:43 | comment | added | Charles Burns | You can read "At Nyquist frequency" as "At or above." The context is in terms of how good a 44.1 or 48KHz recording can be. I'll edit the topic to indicate this. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 23:41 | history | edited | hotpaw2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 23:30 | history | answered | hotpaw2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |