Timeline for Measure the SNR of a signal in the frequency domain?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2014 at 17:08 | answer | added | David Jonsson | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 11, 2014 at 23:40 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSignals/status/532317023510855680 | ||
| Nov 9, 2014 at 23:43 | answer | added | David Jonsson | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 19:55 | vote | accept | random_dsp_guy | ||
| Mar 11, 2014 at 1:50 | comment | added | rickhg12hs | Well, maybe in your signal world. Why someone wouldn't use a simple filter to increase the SNR is at least questionable. Nice OP edit. | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 16:22 | answer | added | MSalters | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 15:45 | history | edited | random_dsp_guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2014 at 15:43 | comment | added | random_dsp_guy | I disagree with you. Since I didn't mention any filters, it's quite clear what the bandwidth of interest is. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 20:45 | comment | added | rickhg12hs | Specifying a SNR without mention of a bandwidth has little meaning. I.e., for a pure tone, the narrower the bandwidth, the higher the SNR. That's one of the main reasons to use a filter - increase the SNR. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 2:10 | answer | added | impoliticus | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 0:13 | history | edited | random_dsp_guy |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 23:02 | history | asked | random_dsp_guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |