Timeline for How to outline a defect in an image?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2012 at 13:57 | comment | added | vini | Neural networks why not ! however formulating how it will be done and finding a solution would be tough | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 13:21 | comment | added | MSalters | I'm just thinking what this would do to strawberries. This might be very domain-specific. You could probably use a "similarity to known good pears/bananas/strawberries" measure that would be more robust, but that would deserve its own question. (Neural Network?) | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 6:44 | vote | accept | vini | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 11:30 | answer | added | Stocastico | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 9, 2012 at 5:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSignals/status/167480167168606208 | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:25 | comment | added | vini | Yes its just a discoloration however it gets seperated from the rest of the image which i have already achieved | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 20:34 | comment | added | Spacey | @vini Hmm, would it be correct to say that (so far) a defect is defined as simply a discoloration? That seems to be the only feature here ya? | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 17:54 | history | edited | vini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 218 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 16:58 | comment | added | vini | i think ill need to use connected component labeling to solve my problem | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 16:21 | comment | added | vini | These are fruit defects like bruises, rot, scald , hail etc | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 15:45 | comment | added | Jean-Yves | @vini: checked, but still wondering: what is a defect? | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:24 | comment | added | vini | Check the edit :) | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:23 | history | edited | vini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:18 | comment | added | Phonon | Yes, original images would help. Also, what qualifies as a defect? | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:18 | history | edited | vini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:09 | comment | added | Geerten | You should add more detail, such as, what are the original two images, what operations have you executed on them to obtain this end result, and what is the defect you are talking about? | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 13:46 | history | asked | vini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |