Timeline for Intuitive interpretation of Laplace transform
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 8, 2013 at 19:35 | comment | added | Leo | Interesting, thank you for your answer! Especially the explanation about what a moment is was much more clarifying than what Ive read so far. How the integrals result in the S and the frequency domain is still opaque to me, but how the fourier is a subset of the laplace is more obvious now. Thanks | |
Oct 8, 2013 at 19:31 | vote | accept | Leo | ||
Oct 8, 2013 at 18:07 | comment | added | Royi | I don't see how the Laplace Transform is the "Description of a signal from its moments". I'd be happy to learn this outlook of the things. | |
Oct 8, 2013 at 17:00 | history | answered | PAK-9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |