Take the 2-minute tour ×
Signal Processing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners of the art and science of signal, image and video processing. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a system that gives me a noisy data set similar to the one generated by this matlab/octave code. The y-axis represents the signal intensity and the x-axis represents spatial distance.

noise = randn(1,512);
points = gaussian(512,.01);
noisy = points + .02*(noise');
plot(noisy)

Noisy signal

The actual signal will be asymmetric and not the result of a gaussian function(but close). I can't create the noise accurately by hand and the underlying signal algorithmically so image these two together.

Wavy signal

The goal is to construct an interpolating curve, using bicubic splines, based on only one data set of this signal. The signal cannot be captured multiple times and averaged together to remove the noise. Since the signal is noisy, I can't simply pick points every N samples as the interpolation points so I need to do some signal conditioning first.

I will not be able to use an exact model of the underlying physical process but the sources of noise are known and I can make some assumptions regarding the maximum slope and SNR. The interpolation is used to correct for manufacturing limitations so the curve is intended to be smooth(exclusive of noise) but for cost reasons is not. Therefore we don't expect any large deviations from this example.

My initial approaches used an M-point moving average filter to smooth the signal, then used polyfit handle the ends of the signal. This worked but could potentially reduce the center peak, if M is large enough. I've also since learned smoothing signals before interpolation is generally discouraged.

What would be a better approach to achieve this?

share|improve this question
    
gaussian is not a standard MATLAB function. You should describe the characteristics of your input signal in more detail to get better answers. –  Jason R Feb 20 '13 at 18:37
1  
@Pete I added a plot for you from Octave, feel free to update/change that if it's not what you intended. –  datageist Feb 20 '13 at 18:43
    
@datageist Thanks for the picture. That is the signal I intended. –  Pete Feb 20 '13 at 19:40
    
@JasonR What other information would be helpful? Unfortunately I can't post actual data at the moment. –  Pete Feb 20 '13 at 19:44
1  
Why not to do a least-squares fit if the model function is known? Since the noise is gaussian, the least-squares fit will be the most likelihood estimator - furthermore, you can estimate standard deviation of the noise. Once you have the fitted curve, you can put piecewise splines over it. –  Libor Feb 21 '13 at 9:47
show 2 more comments

2 Answers 2

It seems like you don't want to make any prior assumptions about the exact shape of the signal, other than assuming that it is ``smooth''. This is best attacked using a non-parametric function fitting/regression approach. Use either a) spline fitting or b) kernel smoothing.

Two reasons why this is a good idea:

  1. These methods are optimal in the sense that no other non-parametric filtering technique (moving average, etc.) can give you a better worst case error decay rate. This answers your main question: there is no better method if you care about minimax error.

  2. Spline fitting and kernel regression codes are very easily available.

A quick Google search gives me the following: In Octave interp1 has a 'cubic' option: http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/One_002ddimensional-Interpolation.html

Open source code for kernel smoothing: http://code.google.com/p/pmtk3/source/browse/trunk/matlabTools/stats/kernelSmoothingRegression.m?r=2645&spec=svn2776

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not knowing the underlying model, you might just try a few things and see what best passes your fitness metric. Try interpolating the entire data set with polynomials of various degrees well below N. Try low-pass filters, maybe applied in the frequency domain to an FFT of your data set, with various cut-off frequencies and transition widths to roll-off any spectrum capable of producing a slope over the maximum expected.

You can calculate the maximum slope of each trial, and subtract the trial interpolation from the data to get a hypothetical noise signal. Iterate the polynomial degree and/or the filter passband until you get a maximim slope and a noise level that meets your fitness metric.

You might even be able to automate the above with either a successive approximation or genetic/evolutionary algorithm.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.